hkaiser changed the topic of #ste||ar to: STE||AR: Systems Technology, Emergent Parallelism, and Algorithm Research | stellar-group.org | HPX: A cure for performance impaired parallel applications | github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx | This channel is logged: irclog.cct.lsu.edu
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
K-ballo has quit [Quit: K-ballo]
ahmed_ has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
hkaiser has quit [Quit: Bye!]
ruchipakhle has joined #ste||ar
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
<ruchipakhle>
Hey everyone, Ruchi here
<ruchipakhle>
I am a passionate developer and open-source enthusiast. I'm an active contributor to open-source projects and have contributed to different organizations before. I'm currently an LFX Mentee for the spring cohort at Open Horizon. I was actually going through the Stellar documentation project ideas for GSOD'22 and since it aligns with my technical
<ruchipakhle>
skillset I joined this chat group. Any suggestions on moving forward would be really helpful
<hkaiser>
ruchipakhle: welcome
<hkaiser>
have you found some project ideas that are of interest to you?
<bhumit[m]>
Are the wiki listed ones only available ones for GSoD 22?
<bhumit[m]>
s/ones/ideas/
<hkaiser>
bhumit[m]: those are just ideas, if you have other suggestions, please don't hesitate to pursue them
<ruchipakhle>
hkaiser: oh yes, I went through the entire project idea list for GSoD'22 and every idea seemed to be aligning with my interest tbh
<bhumit[m]>
hkaiser: Okay. I have a couple ones. Is there any submission template like there is for GSoC?
<hkaiser>
ruchipakhle: is it GSoD (documentation) or GSoC (coding) you're interested in?
<hkaiser>
bhumit[m]: nothing specific, but the GSoC one is a good starting point, I guess
<ruchipakhle>
I am interested in documentation ones I did not check the idea list for GSoC
<hkaiser>
bhumit[m]: we need some documentation work related to specific APIs
<hkaiser>
ruchipakhle: ok
<hkaiser>
bhumit[m], ruchipakhle: do you guys know how to create doxygen comments for an API?
<bhumit[m]>
hkaiser: That is one of the ideas actually -- to document specific APIs and add documentation for functions/classes which are missing it.
<bhumit[m]>
Yes, I have worked with Doxygen before.
<hkaiser>
bhumit[m]: cool
<ruchipakhle>
hkaiser: yeah i do know them
<hkaiser>
nice
<ruchipakhle>
also i think in the project ideas list first two ideas are the API documentation ones right?
<ruchipakhle>
so are they on the priority basis?
<hkaiser>
ruchipakhle: the list of ideas is not prioritized
<ruchipakhle>
okay cool
<ruchipakhle>
also where should we submit our proposal like dm you or mail you?
<hkaiser>
ms[m]: how did we handle gsod proposals last year? did those were submitted to you?
<ms[m]>
we made our own google form for applicants to fill in
<hkaiser>
ahh, ok
<hkaiser>
ruchipakhl, bhumit[m]: there you have it ^^ - once accepted to GSoD we will give you a link for submitting your ideas
<ruchipakhle>
thats cool
<bhumit[m]>
<hkaiser> "ruchipakhl, bhumit: there you..." <- Got it. Thanks!
ahmed_ has joined #ste||ar
ruchipakhle has quit [Quit: Client closed]
K-ballo has joined #ste||ar
aacirino has joined #ste||ar
hkaiser has quit [Quit: Bye!]
ruchipakhle has joined #ste||ar
ruchipakhle has quit [Client Quit]
ahmed_ has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
qiu_hcq9102 has joined #ste||ar
qiu_hcq9102 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
diehlpk_work has joined #ste||ar
ahmed_ has joined #ste||ar
<gdaiss[m]>
@hkaiser Quick question: Do we still need this PR for octotiger? https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/octotiger/pull/411 Or will this be changed back in HPX? Just wondering whether I should press merge before we do the octotiger release
<gonidelis[m]>
u should probably ping him when his logged back in (old fashioned non-record tracking irc)
ahmed_ has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
ahmed_ has joined #ste||ar
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
<ahmed_>
I’ve made an external project and it built well
<ahmed_>
I tried the hello world trivial project and it worked to ensure correctness of build
<ahmed_>
But when i made matrix mul it compiled and built
<ahmed_>
But exe gave me hpx::init invalid runtime mode specified
<ahmed_>
Is that related to the way of passing program options ?
<ahmed_>
I’ve found an issue #4662 on hpx github page regarding same error
<ahmed_>
But cant figure out the problem
<hkaiser>
ahmed_: show us the code and the error message
<hkaiser>
ahmed_: also, please give me the command lines you used to configure HPX and your application
<hkaiser>
what options did you pass to cmake
<ahmed_>
I made it by cmake gui
<ahmed_>
Just set 4 env variables : hpx_location , cmake_install_prefix , boost_root , hwloc_root
<ahmed_>
Hpx_dir**
<hkaiser>
ok, did you specify the CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE?
<ahmed_>
No
<ahmed_>
Is that different from choosing inside vs ?
<ahmed_>
Inside vs i chose debug
<ahmed_>
hkaiser: just added it in the Cmake file before project command
<ahmed_>
And still having the same problem
<K-ballo>
environment variables tend to be all uppercase by convention
<ahmed_>
I already made them uppercase sorry for the mess
diehlpk_work has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<gdaiss[m]>
hkaiser: Quick question: Do we still need this PR for octotiger? https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/octotiger/pull/411 Or will this be changed back in HPX? Just wondering whether I should press merge before we do the octotiger release