<nikunj97>
if it looks clean to you, I'll start working on distributed resiliency today
<nikunj97>
is there any example that uses bin pack executor?
<hkaiser>
create one ;-)
<nikunj97>
:D
<hkaiser>
but sure, looks good so far - thanks a lot!
<nikunj97>
it uses deprecated functions, but we can work on them later ;-)
<hkaiser>
sure
Nikunj__ has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
nikunj97 has joined #ste||ar
Nikunj__ has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
nikunj97 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
bita_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
bita_ has joined #ste||ar
hkaiser has quit [Quit: bye]
bita_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
bita_ has joined #ste||ar
bita_ has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
Yorlik_ has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
Yorlik_ has joined #ste||ar
Yorlik_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
Yorlik_ has joined #ste||ar
Yorlik_ has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Yorlik has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has joined #ste||ar
Nikunj__ has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
Yorlik has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
Nikunj__ is now known as nikunj97
<nikunj97>
hkaiser, made the formatting changes you suggested. Does the sfinae implementation looks clean?
<hkaiser>
sure, looks good for now
<hkaiser>
nikunj97: I'd rather have the work being done against HPX than separately as integrating things back is an uneeded burden
<hkaiser>
but in the end it's your choice, certainly
<nikunj97>
hmm.. we can do it that way, sure. But I just wanted to be sure to have everything properly done before making it production ready
<nikunj97>
probably a WIP PR that merges once I have all the work done?
<hkaiser>
sure, as you wish
<nikunj97>
alright. That is doable in that case.
<nikunj97>
hkaiser, let's do it new repo way for now please? Want to make sure everything is in place before we start merging to HPX.
<hkaiser>
nikunj97: as you wish
<nikunj97>
thanks
<hkaiser>
nikunj97: I'd suggest that you use the current resiliency module as the bases, however
<nikunj97>
hkaiser, as in use code from the resiliency module right?
<hkaiser>
yes
<hkaiser>
so that reintegration will be easier
<nikunj97>
yes, I took the base code from there. Everything else will be done on top of it.
<hkaiser>
cool
<nikunj97>
that's why the first PR was about refactoring that code to allow for single entry point
<hkaiser>
nod, thanks
<nikunj97>
now I'll work on adding distributed executors to async replay then replicate.
<nikunj97>
post that a few benchmark runs for implementation overheads (for the paper)
<hkaiser>
sounds good
<nikunj97>
and then we'll need to do a call to discuss about hardware level fault tolerance that I proposed last time.
<hkaiser>
nikunj97: have you talked to Thomas about this?
<nikunj97>
I haven't. I delayed the project until now to work on the Arm paper and with Patrick on the Rpi paper
<hkaiser>
good
<nikunj97>
I'll be working on distributed resiliency the next few weeks adding distributed resiliency. Unfortunately, I'll have to be on a break post that to work on my BS thesis. So I'll start with the actual node level fault tolerance in Jan.
<nikunj97>
as of now, I want to add distributed software resilience to HPX.
<nikunj97>
and if things work nicely, to move to node level faults
weilewei has joined #ste||ar
<nikunj97>
hkaiser, can't find links to the distributed executors. Mind sharing the links again?
nikunj97 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
nikunj has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<hkaiser>
we have not moved those to the module yet
nikunj has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
nikunj has joined #ste||ar
nikunj has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
nikunj has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has joined #ste||ar
joe[m] has quit [Quit: Idle for 30+ days]
neill[m] has left #ste||ar ["Kicked by @appservice-irc:matrix.org : Idle for 30+ days"]
carola[m]1 has left #ste||ar ["Kicked by @appservice-irc:matrix.org : Idle for 30+ days"]
norbert[m] has left #ste||ar ["Kicked by @appservice-irc:matrix.org : Idle for 30+ days"]
smith[m] has left #ste||ar ["Kicked by @appservice-irc:matrix.org : Idle for 30+ days"]
richard[m]1 has quit [Quit: Idle for 30+ days]
ralph[m] has quit [Quit: Idle for 30+ days]
Nikunj__ has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
Nikunj__ is now known as nikunj97
nikunj97 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<bita_>
hkaiser, since yesterday that I updated hpx, I cannot build phylanx. I get linking errors like LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'C:\Repos\hpx\cmake-build-debug\Debug\lib\hpx_iostreamsd.lib' and LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file '..\..\..\Debug\lib\hpx_phylanxd.lib'
<bita_>
I updated my vcpkg and now I get those errors as well as this: "Not using Vcpkg because VcpkgEnabled is "false""
<bita_>
Do you have any advice for me?
<hkaiser>
I don't know anything about this vcpkg change, need to investigate
<hkaiser>
bita_: ^^
<bita_>
before I update vcpkg I still got the linking errors related to hpx
<hkaiser>
bita_: did you use the CMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE?
<hkaiser>
add the cmake toolchain file to your cmake invocation, that should do the trick
<bita_>
sure thanks
<bita_>
Actually, I checked my cmake files and I see that I have had set that in my cache files (set(CMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE "C:/Repos/vcpkg/scripts/buildsystems/vcpkg.cmake" CACHE FILEPATH ""))
<bita_>
hkaiser: ^^
<K-ballo>
setting that from within the cmake lists?
<K-ballo>
that's not really supported.. although if you place it before any project() calls it may just happen to work out
<bita_>
No,on windows I have a bat file that uses .cmakewhich has that settings
<K-ballo>
how does a bat file understand cmake commands?
<K-ballo>
oh, you mean cmake -C ?
<bita_>
Actually Parsa has set that: within the bat file I have: cd hpx