08:37 <ste||ar-github> [hpx] msimberg closed pull request #3504: Add support for rpm packaging (master...rpm) https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/pull/3504

09:27 <ste||ar-github> [hpx] StellarBot pushed 1 new commit to gh-pages: https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/commit/177582dc6c3da4223eee70f0cbd17fbadfca11a8

09:27 <ste||ar-github> hpx/gh-pages 177582d StellarBot: Updating Sphinx docs

13:16 <ste||ar-github> [hpx] msimberg pushed 8 new commits to master: https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/compare/9e6782d90ef6...6a7cbf3eb978

13:16 <ste||ar-github> hpx/master d4bb494 Christoph Junghans: cmake: make install locations configurable

13:16 <ste||ar-github> hpx/master 6743355 Christoph Junghans: cmake: allow to prefix executables

13:16 <ste||ar-github> hpx/master e1dc534 Christoph Junghans: cmake: added HPX_OUTPUT_PREFIX as hpx_option

14:05 <ste||ar-github> [hpx] StellarBot pushed 1 new commit to gh-pages: https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/commit/dcc0c3a15e461d279ab28133b8fd0e0938d34876

14:05 <ste||ar-github> hpx/gh-pages dcc0c3a StellarBot: Updating Sphinx docs

15:47 <diehlpk> heller_ hkaiser , What do you think of the request to fix the compilation of hpx on s390x?

15:47 <diehlpk> Do we intent to support this hardware?

15:48 <hkaiser> I don't even know what architecture this is :/

15:49 <diehlpk> me neither, but Christoph asked for it for fedora and opensuse

15:50 <diehlpk> As we do not have access to such hardware, we would need setup cross compilation

15:50 <zao> IBM Z-series weirdness.

15:51 <K-ballo> what kind of errors are they seeing?

15:51 <diehlpk> K-ballo, https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/issues/3511

15:53 <diehlpk> I was able to fix the arm7 compilation issue and we have packages on fedora and opensuse again

15:53 <diehlpk> hkaiser, see pm

15:54 <hkaiser> what architecture is the s360x?

15:54 <hkaiser> is that the old IBM mainframe ?

15:56 <hkaiser> wasn't even aware that they run Linux on those monsters nowadays ;-)

15:59 <diehlpk> I would prefer to say for now, that we do not provide this arch until one really wants to use hpx on it

16:00 <hkaiser> fine with me

16:01 <hkaiser> is it some must-to-have in order to be a fedora package?

16:01 <diehlpk> No, only major arch should be available

16:01 <diehlpk> we have all of the most common and this is the last missing one

16:03 <diehlpk> We provide armv7hl i686 x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le aarch64 on fedora and opensuse

16:03 <diehlpk> So in my opinion, we provide the all of the arches we target hpx too run

16:06 <diehlpk> hkaiser, For fedora we are now an official package and we just need to keep hpx updated

16:06 <diehlpk> And check it compiles for the next fedora release

16:06 <hkaiser> ok

16:06 <diehlpk> means does compile hpx with the new gcc, hwloc, gperftools, and boost shipped with fedora

16:06 <hkaiser> so let's leave the IBM unsupported until somebody needs it

17:00 <ste||ar-github> [hpx] msimberg created fix-pkgconfig (+1 new commit): https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/commit/6576f383baf4

17:00 <ste||ar-github> hpx/fix-pkgconfig 6576f38 Mikael Simberg: Use GNUInstallDirs lib path in pkgconfig config file

18:05 <wteiwewte> Hi, I am student from Poland. I would like to contribute to HPX. In more details I want to work on issue #3034. I saw two guys declaring to solve this, but didn't notice any pull requests. What is the current state of this issue ? Can I work on this ?

18:14 <K-ballo> notice: someone reports issues with start/stop on the slack channel

19:02 <hkaiser> wteiwewte: unchanged, I have not seen any activity wrt #3034

19:08 <wteiwewte> Okay, I read linked article. We want to automatic serialize brace-initializable type up to some constant arity ? Is 15 (as in article) sufficient ?

19:41 <hkaiser> wteiwewte: it's a start, sure

19:44 <wteiwewte> Thanks, i will work on it

19:46 <hkaiser> great

19:47 <hkaiser> wteiwewte: keep us in the loop here ;-)

20:19 <heller_> diehlpk: I have no access to that platform

20:43 <heller_> hkaiser: welcome back!