nanmiao11 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nikunj has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
nikunj has joined #ste||ar
nikunj has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
nikunj has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has joined #ste||ar
akheir has quit [Quit: Leaving]
bita_ has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
nikunj97 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
nikunj97 has joined #ste||ar
Nikunj__ has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<Nikunj__>
ms[m], Is there a format to add STE||AR GROUP in acknowledgement?
Nikunj__ is now known as nikunj97
weilewei has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<ms[m]>
@freenode_Nikunj__:matrix.org: nothing that I'm aware of, it's host an acknowledgement after all so you're free to write whatever you want
<ms[m]>
*just, not host...
<nikunj97>
ms[m], alright. I'll make something up.
<nikunj97>
btw we're one of the first AMT (if not the first) to have benchmarks for mainstream Arm processors, including the latest A64FX with SVE
diehlpk_work has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk_work_ has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
oscar[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
joe[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
richard[m]1 has quit [Quit: killed]
norbert[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
rori has quit [Quit: killed]
wladimir[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
otto[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
mdiers[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
rajpalsanyam1997 has quit [Quit: killed]
ms[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
diehlpk_mobile[m has quit [Quit: killed]
jbjnr has quit [Quit: killed]
mariella[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
gonidelis[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
klaus[m]1 has quit [Quit: killed]
gretax[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
carola[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
heller1 has quit [Quit: killed]
kordejong has quit [Quit: killed]
neill[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
smith[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
tiagofg[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
gdaiss[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
oleg[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
ralph[m] has quit [Quit: killed]
gonidelis[m] has joined #ste||ar
<gonidelis[m]>
What does AMT stand for?
norbert[m] has joined #ste||ar
kordejong has joined #ste||ar
oscar[m] has joined #ste||ar
ralph[m] has joined #ste||ar
neill[m] has joined #ste||ar
rori has joined #ste||ar
oleg[m] has joined #ste||ar
joe[m] has joined #ste||ar
otto[m] has joined #ste||ar
smith[m] has joined #ste||ar
carola[m] has joined #ste||ar
wladimir[m] has joined #ste||ar
richard[m] has joined #ste||ar
jbjnr has joined #ste||ar
gdaiss[m] has joined #ste||ar
gretax[m] has joined #ste||ar
mdiers[m] has joined #ste||ar
tiagofg[m] has joined #ste||ar
noise[m] has joined #ste||ar
mariella[m] has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk_mobile[m has joined #ste||ar
klaus[m]1 has joined #ste||ar
ms[m] has joined #ste||ar
heller1 has joined #ste||ar
rajpalsanyam1997 has joined #ste||ar
karame_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kale[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
kale[m] has joined #ste||ar
<jbjnr>
Asynchronous Many Tasks (framework)
<jbjnr>
diehlpk_work: ms[m] just fyi. I submitted gsoc evaluation yesterday. I'm sure @weile knows he's doing fine.
sayefsakin has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<ms[m]>
thanks jbjnr for filling it in
sayefsakin has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
noise[m] has quit [Quit: Idle for 30+ days]
sayefsakin has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
<hkaiser>
ms[m]: yt?
kale[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
kale[m] has joined #ste||ar
Yorlik has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk_work has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
akheir has joined #ste||ar
nanmiao11 has joined #ste||ar
kale[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
kale[m] has joined #ste||ar
V|r is now known as Vir
kale[m] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<ms[m]>
hkaiser: hey, here (holidays-ish this week, so not at the computer all the time)
kale[m] has joined #ste||ar
<hkaiser>
ms[m]: no problem
<hkaiser>
ms[m]: I had a question about any.hpp (which is in serialization now), but I think I found my answer
<hkaiser>
ms[m]: pls go back to holiday mode
kale[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
kale[m] has joined #ste||ar
<ms[m]>
no worries :P feel free to ping me during the week though, I might just not reply very quickly
karame_ has joined #ste||ar
weilewei has joined #ste||ar
<gonidelis[m]>
hkaiser: how could I know that `FwIterE` had to be the argument of `algorithm_result`? I remember reading it in a TS but I just can't find it
<hkaiser>
what's the return value of ranges::for_each?
<hkaiser>
well, the question is not quite fair
<hkaiser>
let me have a look at the code
<hkaiser>
gonidelis[m]: where is that code that's failing to compile?
diehlpk has joined #ste||ar
nikunj97 has joined #ste||ar
<gonidelis[m]>
haven't upload it yet... it's very very messy
<gonidelis[m]>
it's my `for_each` adaptation
<hkaiser>
I mean on master
<hkaiser>
I think using FwdIterB for the result is correct
<hkaiser>
something else must be wrong
<gonidelis[m]>
just didn't know why the end-iter goes as an argument to the algorithm_result . rori I am like 99% sure that you had shown me the part where this was indicated on a TS
<gonidelis[m]>
you mean this?
<hkaiser>
gonidelis[m]: I think the begin iterator is the one to be returned