hkaiser changed the topic of #ste||ar to: STE||AR: Systems Technology, Emergent Parallelism, and Algorithm Research | stellar-group.org | HPX: A cure for performance impaired parallel applications | github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx | This channel is logged: irclog.cct.lsu.edu
<hkaiser>
dkaratza[m]: I don't understandn the question
<hkaiser>
if you edit that file you need to rerun cmake for it to be used to generate the actual rst file
<dkaratza[m]>
<hkaiser> "if you edit that file you need..." <- oh i thought because of the note that i should not edit manually. but now i understand that the note refers to the actual rst file like you said
hkaiser has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
diehlpk has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk has quit [Client Quit]
diehlpk has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk has quit [Client Quit]
diehlpk has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk has quit [Client Quit]
diehlpk has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
diehlpk has joined #ste||ar
diehlpk has quit [Client Quit]
<zao>
Not related to HPX, but how long has it been standard C++ to be able to use constexpr variables in preprocessor conditions? It completely breaks my mental translation model :D
<gonidelis[m]>
since this iterator template overload is specialized with `is_const = false`, are the operator overloads valid for `my_outer_iterator<true>` too?