00:34
jbjnr has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:39
hkaiser has quit [Quit: bye]
02:47
K-ballo has quit [Quit: K-ballo]
06:19
jbjnr has joined #ste||ar
06:19
jbjnr_ has joined #ste||ar
06:23
jbjnr has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
06:32
jbjnr__ has joined #ste||ar
06:35
jbjnr_ has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
06:48
jbjnr_ has joined #ste||ar
06:51
jbjnr__ has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
06:58
nikunj97 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
06:59
nikunj has joined #ste||ar
07:09
<
simbergm >
heller, mbremer sorry, my bad, I merged that too eagerly
07:10
<
simbergm >
I'll revert it
07:10
<
simbergm >
heller: you're back!? :)
07:10
<
heller >
Kind of ;)
07:11
<
heller >
I really wonder why the unit tests didn't fail...
07:15
<
simbergm >
it's my fault, I merged it too quickly
07:15
<
simbergm >
hides in shame
07:16
<
simbergm >
what does kind of mean?
07:58
<
simbergm >
heller: do you have time to look through #3784?
08:14
nikunj has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
08:34
<
heller >
simbergm: I will, yes
08:34
<
heller >
simbergm: I still have 5 more exams to do ;)
08:35
<
simbergm >
heller: thanks, let me know if you go rebasing it so we don't step on each other's toes
08:35
<
simbergm >
you probably saw that I'm updating your modular PRs
08:35
<
simbergm >
want to get them in soon
08:39
<
heller >
yes, thanks a lot for that
09:54
<
heller >
simbergm: there's a compilation error now
09:54
<
jbjnr_ >
heller: exams? what are you on about? seriously?
09:54
<
simbergm >
sanitizers?
09:55
<
simbergm >
yeah, I think the rebase was a bit sloppy with the coroutines changes
09:55
<
simbergm >
I can take care of it
10:07
<
jbjnr_ >
shall I merge #3782 (Cherry-picked tuple and thread_init_data fixes from #3701)
10:26
<
simbergm >
jbjnr_: yeah, go for it
10:26
<
simbergm >
(btw, I've been updating dependencies for pycicle and making a mess out of it, hoping that they're back to normal soon
10:29
<
simbergm >
zao: we have working docs builds again :)
10:45
<
heller >
what was the issue?
10:58
<
simbergm >
ninja building in parallel by default and me not realizing
10:59
<
heller >
interesting
10:59
<
simbergm >
well, it's "fixed" in that I just set -j1
10:59
<
simbergm >
don't know if there's a way to tell cmake "these targets are basically independent bu can't be built at the same time"
11:00
<
heller >
that doesn't make sense ;)
11:00
<
heller >
if they can't be built in parallel, they depend on each other, no?
11:11
<
zao >
Dependencies has some aspect of requiredness to it, these are just in need of serialization
11:13
K-ballo has joined #ste||ar
11:16
<
simbergm >
exactly the latter
11:16
<
simbergm >
they can run in any order, just not at the same time
11:17
<
simbergm >
I could probably make them actually independent if they use separate temp directories etc.
11:20
eschnett has quit [Quit: eschnett]
11:46
eschnett has joined #ste||ar
11:48
eschnett has quit [Client Quit]
12:11
chinz07[m] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
12:12
simbergm has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
12:27
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
13:16
eschnett has joined #ste||ar
13:45
aserio has joined #ste||ar
13:49
hkaiser has quit [Quit: bye]
14:00
daissgr has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.9.1]
14:38
aserio has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
14:48
aserio has joined #ste||ar
15:57
<
diehlpk_work >
parsa, Please do not forget to sketch down your project ideas for Google Season of Documentation before tomorrow's meeting
16:06
eschnett has quit [Quit: eschnett]
16:12
eschnett has joined #ste||ar
16:30
david_pfander has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
16:57
maxwellr96 has joined #ste||ar
17:07
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
17:34
weilewei09 has joined #ste||ar
17:38
aserio has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
17:49
jaafar has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
18:01
hkaiser has quit [Quit: bye]
18:13
aserio has joined #ste||ar
18:29
<
aserio >
jbjnr_: I am assuming that we do not have a meeting today
18:58
jaafar has joined #ste||ar
19:26
aserio has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
19:29
aserio has joined #ste||ar
19:33
<
maxwellr96 >
Does anyone know why an hpx::lcos::barrier would successfully pass only when locality 0 is included?
19:34
<
maxwellr96 >
In my example, if I try to include localities 1 and 2 on the barrier, it hangs, while if 0 and 1 are included, it does not hang
19:35
<
K-ballo >
sounds like a bug
19:36
<
K-ballo >
can you try reducing that to a minimal test case?
19:46
mdiers_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
20:22
aserio has quit [Quit: aserio]
20:40
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
20:42
<
hkaiser >
maxwellr96: that's a bug, clearly
20:43
<
hkaiser >
please create a ticket and assign it heller (sithhell on github)
21:09
<
diehlpk_work >
hkaiser, see pm
22:59
maxwellr96 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
23:23
eschnett has quit [Quit: eschnett]