nikunj has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
K-ballo has quit [Quit: K-ballo]
nikunj has joined #ste||ar
nikunj has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
hkaiser has quit [Quit: bye]
jbjnr has joined #ste||ar
daissgr has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
daissgr has joined #ste||ar
K-ballo has joined #ste||ar
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
<hkaiser>
simbergm: yt?
hkaiser has quit [Quit: bye]
aserio has joined #ste||ar
<diehlpk_work>
simbergm, Can you take care of the GSoC evaluation?
<diehlpk_work>
I received the e-mail yesterday
<diehlpk_work>
*GSoD
<simbergm>
diehlpk_work: yeah, I'll take care of it
<diehlpk_work>
Ok, cool
<diehlpk_work>
simbergm, Any nes about the HPX 1.4 release?
<simbergm>
diehlpk_work: things are quiet, hoping to still get apex fixed for the release
<simbergm>
I may do an rc this week in any case just to check we haven't messed something up
<K-ballo>
I should try and get the de-lambdified assert
<simbergm>
K-ballo: that would be lovely if you have the time to look at it
aserio has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
hkaiser has joined #ste||ar
<hkaiser>
simbergm: ?
<simbergm>
hkaiser: here
<hkaiser>
hey
<hkaiser>
have you seen that the docs step is permanently failing now?
<simbergm>
what's up?
<hkaiser>
some strange assertion from the sphinx tool
<simbergm>
no, I haven't, thanks for telling me!
<hkaiser>
it's on master as well
<simbergm>
hmm, I wonder... auriane's lcos pr had that temporarily and it was supposed to be fixed, but I didn't check the circleci results before merging :/
<simbergm>
I'm guessing it's that, but I'll talk to her about it (she's gone until wednesday)
<hkaiser>
yah, it was introduced by the lcos PR
<hkaiser>
sure, no worries
<simbergm>
okay, then it's definitely that
<simbergm>
I think she has a fix
<simbergm>
it was some api reference that sphinx wasn't happy with
<simbergm>
thanks!
<simbergm>
hkaiser: you're on a roll with your scheduler prs :)
<hkaiser>
;-)
<hkaiser>
a couple of free days...
<simbergm>
do you think you want any of them in for the release? if yes I'll look through them tomorrow, but otherwise we'll take it easy
<hkaiser>
the inline execution thingy will make a big difference
<hkaiser>
no rush, they are not ready I'd like to have more time
<simbergm>
no problem, then we take it slow
<simbergm>
I'm basically just hoping that we get kevin back to talk about the apex build, otherwise we're pretty set for a release I think
<hkaiser>
you might want to invite him for Thursday, although it's 7am for him, so he might pass
<simbergm>
good point, I'll do that
<hkaiser>
simbergm: he is being paid for that work again, so he should be willing to invest time
<hkaiser>
simbergm: what I would like to do is to pull a couple of flyby fixes from #4250 and have those in the release
aserio has joined #ste||ar
<hkaiser>
simbergm: what is your deadline for the release?
<hkaiser>
how much time do I have for those?
<hkaiser>
K-ballo: I did mark a function that is wrapped by an action as noexcept and ran into clang errors with that
<hkaiser>
so noexcept is part of the type system for clang but not for MSVC?
<K-ballo>
`noexcept` is part of the type system for all, but there's a standard conversion from noexcept fun to not-noexcept fun
<K-ballo>
maybe related to the fact that the standard disallows implicit conversions in template arguments
<hkaiser>
not sure
<K-ballo>
so a noexcept function would not be a valid argument for a non-noexcept non-type template argument
<hkaiser>
MSC accepts it :/
<hkaiser>
MSVC
<hkaiser>
have not tried yet if adding a specialization for noexcept creates ambiguities for MSVC, however
<K-ballo>
how old is that clang?
<hkaiser>
cirlceci, I think it's clang 7
<hkaiser>
my local clang failed as well, I think its 8
<zao>
Weren't this an platform ABI thing not having mangling for it?
<zao>
I vaguely recollect from Slack that it's silly, but not how.
aserio has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
aserio has joined #ste||ar
<K-ballo>
in the past I had used a two step dance for noexcept fun specification, so it would work with both 17 and 11